Recommended Reading | November 2014

MalleefowlQAEcologist José J. Lahoz-Monfort introduces the fox baiting experiment we’re developing for malleefowl conservation.

Wendy Williams and Stephen Ceci claim that academic science is no longer sexist, and Emily Willingham posts a critique.  (via Nicole Cliffe)

Drew Tyre rejects the linear deficit model of science communication in favour of a dialogue that includes values.

The European Space Agency can land a probe on a comet, but it can’t establish a welcoming working environment for women.

The World Parks Congress brought mallee birds and problematic fire policies into the mainstream media.

QAEcologist Hannah Pearson suggests that more environmental researchers start walking (and not flying) their talk.

Ian Lunt discusses the value of photographs for documenting ecological changes.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Recommended Reading | November 2014

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s